All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Martin Petermann <martin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] scsi: fix check of PQ and PDT bits for WLUNs
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:14:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219349654.3265.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080812114123.133900000@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 13:40 +0200, Martin Petermann wrote:
> plain text document attachment (scsi_scan.diff)
> From: Martin Petermann <martin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> With kernel version 2.6.19 a check was introduced not to create a generic
> SCSI device for devices that return PQ=1 and PDT=0x1f. For WLUNs (see 
> SAM-3, p. 41ff) generic SCSI devices should be created unconditionally
> without looking at the PQ bit. I'm referring here to the thread "With kernel
> 2.6.19 no sg devices for devices that return PQ=1, PDT=0x1f" of the 
> linux-scsi forum. This is my proposed fix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Petermann <martin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2008-08-12 12:51:32.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2008-08-12 12:58:16.000000000 +0200
> @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@
>  #define SCSI_SCAN_TARGET_PRESENT	1
>  #define SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT		2
>  
> +#define SCSI_W_LUN_BASE 0xc100
> +#define SCSI_W_LUN_REPORT_LUNS (SCSI_W_LUN_BASE + 1)
> +#define SCSI_W_LUN_ACCESS_CONTROL (SCSI_W_LUN_BASE + 2)
> +#define SCSI_W_LUN_TARGET_LOG_PAGE (SCSI_W_LUN_BASE + 3)

These need to be in a header file, I think, probably scsi.h

>  static const char *scsi_null_device_strs = "nullnullnullnull";
>  
>  #define MAX_SCSI_LUNS	512
> @@ -1080,7 +1085,7 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
>  	 * PDT=1Fh none (no FDD connected to the requested logical unit)
>  	 */
>  	if (((result[0] >> 5) == 1 || starget->pdt_1f_for_no_lun) &&
> -	     (result[0] & 0x1f) == 0x1f) {
> +	    (result[0] & 0x1f) == 0x1f && (lun & 0xff00) != SCSI_W_LUN_BASE) {

And this should probably be wrapped nicely too.

>  		SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(3, printk(KERN_INFO
>  					"scsi scan: peripheral device type"
>  					" of 31, no device added\n"));

Does this look OK?

James

---

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
index 84b4879..34d0de6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
@@ -1080,7 +1080,8 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget,
 	 * PDT=1Fh none (no FDD connected to the requested logical unit)
 	 */
 	if (((result[0] >> 5) == 1 || starget->pdt_1f_for_no_lun) &&
-	     (result[0] & 0x1f) == 0x1f) {
+	    (result[0] & 0x1f) == 0x1f &&
+	    !scsi_is_wlun(lun)) {
 		SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(3, printk(KERN_INFO
 					"scsi scan: peripheral device type"
 					" of 31, no device added\n"));
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi.h b/include/scsi/scsi.h
index 5c40cc5..192f871 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi.h
@@ -309,6 +309,20 @@ struct scsi_lun {
 };
 
 /*
+ * The Well Known LUNS (SAM-3) in our int representation of a LUN
+ */
+#define SCSI_W_LUN_BASE 0xc100
+#define SCSI_W_LUN_REPORT_LUNS (SCSI_W_LUN_BASE + 1)
+#define SCSI_W_LUN_ACCESS_CONTROL (SCSI_W_LUN_BASE + 2)
+#define SCSI_W_LUN_TARGET_LOG_PAGE (SCSI_W_LUN_BASE + 3)
+
+static inline int scsi_is_wlun(unsigned int lun)
+{
+	return (lun & 0xff00) == SCSI_W_LUN_BASE;
+}
+
+
+/*
  *  MESSAGE CODES
  */
 



  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-21 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-12 11:40 [patch 0/1] [PATCH] scsi: fix check of PQ and PDT bits for WLUNs Martin Petermann
2008-08-12 11:40 ` [patch 1/1] " Martin Petermann
2008-08-21 20:14   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-08-25  8:41     ` Swen Schillig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1219349654.3265.38.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.