From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KYHW2-0005kK-Db for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:40:38 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYHW0-0005id-AM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:40:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYHVy-0005h4-4R for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:40:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42849 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KYHVx-0005ge-Hq for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:40:33 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]:64873) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KYHVw-00032Y-8j for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:40:32 -0400 Received: from [85.180.32.252] (e180032252.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.32.252]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML21M-1KYHVk3eqz-00085s; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:40:21 +0200 From: Felix Zielcke To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <1219341901.4090.69.camel@fz.local> References: <1219336815.5591.0@tangerine> <1219338223.4090.50.camel@fz.local> <1219338766.5591.1@tangerine> <1219339864.4090.58.camel@fz.local> <1219341901.4090.69.camel@fz.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:40:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1219830019.4370.12.camel@fz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18coUMXFkXhFIegapkhbzFrppDoqEIZVTmzgku /xoc+pho3yWsoTgHIPgshZds4VIoAZ8NTfLbopX7oqywED61yO /XZxdRNNov7PIj/td8zoMPszX58FFQj X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) Subject: Re: [Fwd: Bug#495949: grub-common: grub-probe segfaults] X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:40:36 -0000 Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 20:05 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > The report is on http://bugs.debian.org/495949 > Anyone on this list has an idea about this? I'm not a guy who sees a mistake by just looking at the sourcecode. Just having a LUKS crypto device and a logical volume on there doestn't cause it. grub-probe just says unknown mapping for vg-lvol0 So probable I need to reassemble the setup from Jean-Luc Jean-Luc when and now did you create your whole LVM/CRYPT/RAID thing? The output of cryptsetup status could be helpful too. I only played now a bit with `mdadm' and LVM for grub but never with `cryptsetup' By the way I noticed that on LUKS there's a /dev/dm-0 as you have it used for the LVM but there's a /dev/mapper/name too though that shouldn't make a difference. I used the dm-0 one. -- Felix Zielcke