From: Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
bgmerrell@novell.com, hirofuchi@users.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, usbip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: USBIP protocol
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:31:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220049103.7145.23.camel@californication> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ej47q5k8.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Hi Matthew,
> > I'm in the middle of implementing a userspace client for usbip and I
> > strongly feel that the protocol needs to be changed before it is merged.
> >
> > - I'm unconvinced that TCP is the correct protocol to be running this over.
> > I understand the reluctance to use UDP, but the protocol is fundamentally
> > packet-based. If TCP is used, the delimitation of packets within the
> > stream needs to be much more robust.
>
> If you want reliable transport with record boundaries an alternative
> would be also SCTP. Main drawback is that firewalls often don't support it
> though (but presumably that wouldn't be a big issue for this)
I would also have proposed SCTP. The telco carries seems be very happy
with it.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-29 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-29 14:02 USBIP protocol Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-29 14:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-29 22:31 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2008-08-29 20:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-29 20:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-08-29 14:30 ` Greg KH
2008-08-29 14:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-29 14:54 ` Greg KH
2008-08-29 15:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-29 15:53 ` Dave Higton
2008-09-03 4:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-03 15:40 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-03 19:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-03 20:15 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-04 21:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-04 22:15 ` Greg KH
2008-09-05 3:26 ` Pete Zaitcev
2008-09-05 11:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-09-05 15:05 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-09 0:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-09 7:12 ` Steve Calfee
2008-09-09 7:33 ` Greg KH
2008-09-09 8:04 ` Greg KH
2008-09-09 15:21 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-03 15:57 ` Greg KH
2008-09-03 19:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-04 2:41 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1220049103.7145.23.camel@californication \
--to=holtmann@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bgmerrell@novell.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hirofuchi@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=usbip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.