From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KZrKV-0005Jo-H3 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:15 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZrKU-0005Jj-EU for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZrKS-0005JX-Nc for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59028 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZrKS-0005JU-Io for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:12 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:31618) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZrKS-0002vG-62 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:12 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.81]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 31 Aug 2008 14:07:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (static-72-92-88-10.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [72.92.88.10]) by relay.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E7C618F22 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <20080831164947.GA23030@thorin> References: <20080831164947.GA23030@thorin> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:07:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1220206028.13973.3.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: renaming util/biosdisk.c X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:07:14 -0000 On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 18:49 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Hi, > > I think we discussed before about util/biosdisk.c being a confusing name, > but I can't find that thread. Did we agree on renaming it to something > else? If so, what to? My preference: util/hostdisk.c Runners-up: util/osdisk.c util/sysdisk.c util/disk.c -- Regards, Pavel Roskin