From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KaqLV-0002HL-QM for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:16:21 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaqLQ-0002Em-Ut for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:16:17 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaqLO-0002Ce-1k for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:16:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50155 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaqLM-0002CF-Ig for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:16:12 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.148]:25790) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaqLM-0006E9-QA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:16:13 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1129745eyg.24 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:16:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=ORXigsRuKRbhRT78kUjGlufxF48PfhJ8grABTVvmQg8=; b=ZO2rSZFhB2BQpx0f5Qxca2ma1KGtfLBKYNP+Ad4cMQxkVMOI3+m31O2ymyG8E6L78l 9fZOwRSjA/mBGQ312O3IXiYkmNOwcg26x9jUglZZhIPtAUXHFjOpA6PV1/MrRZO6IzbQ TVvEtbv4eYTvD3Xbo4av2rOQxZSA8G7HUOGzI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; b=eS+deHM8cRDTqTUxWagCKAQH+4V2L6ZTipk4NNTvGXqE+M8t1CEXbMqLtC9SnJgRCg 7kqPAmFnE+MvUNgK0SmrPNQf76oU2gc5pmHBt8VYpa/7m9e2qj4iQqlYYa6mLebDLnwH KobnLWCkaaC8Al+nDVkKIB2G/l2ogw1FZPcCs= Received: by 10.210.59.14 with SMTP id h14mr9494109eba.12.1220440571203; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? ( [213.37.137.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm11438008eyh.2.2008.09.03.04.16.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:16:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Javier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn?= To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <48BE54A2.1070008@gmail.com> References: <48BD4C52.6040308@gmail.com> <1220367299.23879.15.camel@localhost> <48BD62BE.7090507@gmail.com> <1220373059.23879.25.camel@localhost> <48BD8847.9030502@gmail.com> <1220386216.23879.55.camel@localhost> <48BDBC96.3010602@gmail.com> <1220398682.23879.70.camel@localhost> <48BDD573.5010809@gmail.com> <1220403254.23879.81.camel@localhost> <48BE54A2.1070008@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZAH+bZ4GEtfH2f7rqwV6" Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:19:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1220440750.23879.96.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: Sendkey patch X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:16:18 -0000 --=-ZAH+bZ4GEtfH2f7rqwV6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi again, El mi=C3=A9, 03-09-2008 a las 11:10 +0200, phcoder escribi=C3=B3: > >> I'll have a look at it but not sure to find anything since I'm not > >> familiar with either ata or reiserfs internal structure. > > I was not suggesting that it was you or me who did it; it was a general > > "call" for GRUB devs... (ahem xD) > >=20 > I understand. I was saying that I'll just have a look at least to know > what I'm talking about. But even if we manage to decrease the size of > reiserfs module there are still other FS which could result in big > modules e.g. ZFS. Of course, but even though we should strive to support te widest module configurations possible, GRUB is no panacea. Even when an initialized GRUB could cope with a ZFS partition in a LVM+RAID on SATA drives not supported by the BIOS, one should not really expect to be able to boot directly off it - get a simpler boot scheme, man! extN, FAT or even SFS are way simpler filesystems which should be used for boot partitions. More complex filesystems such as ReiserFS or NTFS require _less_ complex schemes such as no LVM+RAID in order to keep the total core size manageable. --=-ZAH+bZ4GEtfH2f7rqwV6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUASL5yrqSl+Fbdeo72AQL56BAArpL27ZiaM3HCe7M1mgag0oKw2kMkTPvc EnZYIKgSkARv2X61YHZVWwoz23B9R2/H4osXZWIImSU8g0laqKLwI8smQewf+nW3 eRnb0oDNK/d4ovwB1Sj3k8Im0v5BkG8ggwMmTw89qEKchEVduziiWe+RLEILrk52 ryPFwS0Zbp3KkBgSOBQDVHylQC0i4l9I+XfCgkYJ1zjBRnU9FReUmLQatG7Fl6CN 6Gl69voqntWcCnH9EzoGlgbEp4/5olKNA6IFy+tA/X4s3IgvsWtOvLmUUDqDDF1e 0A9M3boZx2lXX7XHKDwlNnMvKeuWygfUdjNiUY/OshMGexAm6e+G1eUVUcpBOITg GTGPZ4qNFn8dqQmF8/H6qYIwUiHCXQ1xdBUrlTX1UBG/0sFh3uu3Uhb32lxFpxo+ u0aO3aSbhcoZLmdc2lkwLmzp5Tn9n01PPlHMqtCAZ+BZUJy4wKUeLEteCVpMoyAA 82ycFCTF9alFJ0N3tuQ4u+nmauYuPQmc/Ml2NPQRvxoAQcQ0mbnxQDDrhC4kWMfD SVnVT6Wy6ruD6QlKMH4C3jCa4iD/MsoHaIWHzqLJX1gHBb4vHWJOo1iRkkg63BA0 fFw4fEGTG0hPUBhhXVtGaatrAQ5hRy90TPrVRe3IYOrMoK+StW8bYvp4zjxD09uC 8SCEqT2g1I0= =eAIX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZAH+bZ4GEtfH2f7rqwV6--