From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KbyHR-0006Cx-Gl for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:56:49 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbyHP-0006CQ-8W for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:56:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbyHM-0006C1-Pc for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:56:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42029 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbyHM-0006Bw-MF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:56:44 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:52220) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KbyHM-0004ry-Eh for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:56:44 -0400 Received: from [85.180.56.14] (e180056014.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.56.14]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwh2-1KbyHK3W9a-0007Yz; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:56:43 +0200 From: Felix Zielcke To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <1220556143.18782.46.camel@fz.local> References: <1220520596.4167.24.camel@fz.local> <1220556143.18782.46.camel@fz.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:56:41 +0200 Message-Id: <1220709401.4205.2.camel@fz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+ljNgBpnJKf7QWgONkUGUszyKPqfrmBYzfK/r phVbsuFpmWnSCj/h/DjA7CBjkaYwUgqcGQmuDWmCu0t76I3ZRe jXh32hqVODAIZxkYko6cjRn6n6ut+Zc X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) Subject: Re: floating point exception in disk/raid.c:206 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:56:47 -0000 Commited. Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 11:29 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > > > The easiest fix would be probable to just set chunk_size to for example > > 64. > > Attached patch does it, but maybe you have a better/other idea? > > Thanks to Bean on IRC. > I think this is now the right place to do it, at end of insert_array in > case of a new one.