From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH git latest] drivers/scsi: fixing wrong comment before new_buffer_tape()
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:20:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222446056.3971.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080926170937.2983fc29@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 17:09 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Looks true to me for the current versions of the code. In fact it is only
> > > ever called from the initialisation function that I can see so chunks of
> > > the code could simply go away as well as bits of the comment. Ditto the
> > > one in drivers/scsi/st.c
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
> > >
> >
> > I am sorry I didn't quite understand. You mean it is true that caller
> > must hold os_scsi_tapes_lock?
>
> Sorry - I mean what you claim is true - that the comment is incorrect.
So, I think I'm missing a piece of this: There's no patch in this
thread (I presume it's lurking somewhere on lkml). Could someone repost
the proposed patch and copy the tape maintainer: Kai Makisara
<Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi> to get his input?
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-26 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-25 17:49 [PATCH git latest] drivers/scsi: fixing wrong comment before new_buffer_tape() Lin Tan
2008-09-26 10:13 ` Alan Cox
2008-09-26 16:05 ` Tammy
2008-09-26 16:09 ` Alan Cox
2008-09-26 16:09 ` Alan Cox
2008-09-26 16:20 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-09-26 17:06 ` Lin Tan
2008-09-26 17:06 ` Lin Tan
2008-09-26 19:55 ` Kai Makisara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1222446056.3971.19.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Kai.Makisara@kolumbus.fi \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.