From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
od@suse.com, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hch@lst.de, David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/10] relay revamp, third installment
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:17:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222496261.6710.71.camel@charm-linux> (raw)
Here's the current relay cleanup patchset.
1-2 make the write path completely replaceable.
3 adds flags along with some related cleanup.
4-8 remove the padding in several stages.
The new patches in this set are:
9 simplifies the callbacks - now that we have flags, the subbuf_start
callback is much simpler, has been combined with notify_consumers and
has been renamed new_subbuf. Because part of the simplification has
been to handle buffer-full conditions and count lost events internally,
normal applications don't have to pay attention to it at all.
10 completely removes the idea of sub-buffers completely and now deals
only with pages. relay_open() channges accordingly - buffer sizes are
now in pages and consumers are woken only every n_wakeup pages, or never
if this is 0.
It's a work in progress, but because I wanted the intermediate stages to
actually work and not break anything, some of these patches, especially
05, are just temporary and will be removed in the next iteration.
I didn't have time to clean up the first 3 either - I'll also do that
the next time around.
In the next round I plan to do vmap removal.
Tom
reply other threads:[~2008-09-27 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1222496261.6710.71.camel@charm-linux \
--to=zanussi@comcast.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=dwilder@us.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=od@suse.com \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.