From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754529AbYI0R4s (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:56:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752921AbYI0R4j (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:56:39 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:39460 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752848AbYI0R4i (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:56:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Martin Bligh , Martin Bligh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Mathieu Desnoyers , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , David Wilder , hch@lst.de, Tom Zanussi , Steven Rostedt In-Reply-To: References: <20080925195522.GA22248@elte.hu> <20080925201211.GA1878@elte.hu> <20080925211017.GA12689@elte.hu> <20080925214134.GA23025@elte.hu> <20080925221441.GA29060@elte.hu> <20080927171640.GA1990@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:50:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1222537829.16700.304.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 13:38 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > It does not even implement the merge sort. That's up to the > tracer to handle. You could though, as you have the timestamps.. > So yes, the tracer can implement anything it wants on top of the ring > buffer ;-) Mathieu seems to disagree, it would be good if he can share some specifics so we can work on resolving those.