From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9KIol8u012691 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:50:47 -0400 Received: from cdc-exfep1.ciber.cbr.inc (fw.ciber.com [12.10.248.50]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9KIoY59006940 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:50:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVs corrupted after pvresize From: Peter Larsen In-Reply-To: References: <48F7AD78.1000002@knebb.de> <48F80EFB.30404@knebb.de> <1224221030.7772.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:50:32 -0400 Message-Id: <1224528632.6013.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 11:41 -0400, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > Having used AIX LVM, I can say that Linux LVM has a way to go before > it reaches that level of ease of use. But it keeps getting better, > and I get to participate! I'm currious - my exposure to LVM like systems is mainly on Linux. Where's the catch? I find the basic LVM command structure pretty straight forward and easy. There's even a couple of GUI's available now to make the LVM management easier. Can you give an example or two on how the LVM differs on the user-friendliness areas? --- Regards Peter Larsen "Here's something to think about: How come you never see a headline like `Psychic Wins Lottery'?" -- Jay Leno