From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2B5DDDE7 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:44:20 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Please pull from 'for-2.6.28' branch From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <1224547898.7654.210.camel@pasglop> References: <1224547898.7654.210.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:44:13 +1100 Message-Id: <1224560653.7654.224.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > - Finally, the Kconfig change shouldn't have been in your tree at all, > or at least not without my or paulus ack and prior argeement that it > should be merged that way. No big deal with this obviously correct > patch but where do we put the limit ? Same with the CONFIG_RELOCATABLE build fix. I'll pick both from patchwork into my bundle for linus and they shouldn't go through your tree unless prior approval. Cheers, Ben.