From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: ttydev tree build failure
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:35:54 +1100
Message-ID: <1224747354.7654.394.camel@pasglop>
References: <20081023172938.0460b191.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	 <20081023083406.671d4101@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:56952 "EHLO gate.crashing.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752307AbYJWHgT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:36:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20081023083406.671d4101@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>

On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 08:34 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> Patch is correct.
> 
> Do the hvc patches have dependancies on the PPC tree as well as the
> tty tree ?

Note that I have a serie of 5 hvc patches in the ppc tree...

Ben.