From: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
To: "Miloslav Trmač" <mitr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle timestamp 0.0 in auparse, was Re: audit-viewer help needed
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:19:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1226089188.7321.128.camel@homeserver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1222126221.2685.81.camel@amilo>
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 23:30 +0000, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
> the attached patch modifies auparse not to handle timestamp 0.x
> specially by using out-of-band information (parse_state == EVENT_EMPTY)
> instead of assuming (au->le.e.sec == 0) has a special meaning. As far
> as I can see, this the two conditions are equivalent if no event has a
> timestamp 0.x.
>
> The patch also decreases the assumed minimal length of a timestamp.
>
> I have tested this only minimally - I have checked that (make check)
> succeeds, and that audit-viewer doesn't crash on startup.
>
> This patch fixes handling of the following Lenny's audit record:
>
> > node=hugo type=AVC msg=audit(0.000:6760): avc: denied { recvfrom }
> > for pid=2589 comm="lockd" saddr=127.0.0.1 src=687 daddr=127.0.0.1
> > dest=111 netif=lo scontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023
> > tcontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s15:c0.c1023 tclass=association
>
> I'm curious how this audit record could have been created (notabile is
> that the previous record has a sequence ID 6758 and a reasonable
> timestamp). Lenny, Steve, any ideas?
>
> Thank you,
> Mirek
Steve, Mirek -
This patch didn't make it into the 1.7.9 code?
I have been running with it since its release.
Even if the kernel was patched I thought this was good.
Thx,
LCB.
--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny@magitekltd.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 0:02 audit-viewer help needed LC Bruzenak
[not found] ` <1221812917.2947.10.camel@amilo>
[not found] ` <1221830658.6513.4.camel@homeserver>
2008-09-22 23:30 ` [PATCH] Handle timestamp 0.0 in auparse, was " Miloslav Trmač
2008-09-23 0:38 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-09-23 0:57 ` Miloslav Trmač
2008-09-23 1:04 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-10-18 15:51 ` Steve Grubb
2008-11-07 20:19 ` LC Bruzenak [this message]
2009-01-07 15:17 ` Account Lockouts Starr-Renee Corbin
2009-01-07 15:25 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1226089188.7321.128.camel@homeserver \
--to=lenny@magitekltd.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=mitr@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.