From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [82.71.203.194] (helo=crown.reciva.com)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <pb@reciva.com>) id 1KzZGM-0008Dz-Rj
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:05:15 +0100
Received: from castle.reciva.com ([82.71.203.193]
	helo=lurch.internal.reciva.com)
	by crown.reciva.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pb@reciva.com>) id 1KzZEa-0003qZ-4e
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:03:24 +0000
Received: from mill.internal.reciva.com ([192.168.106.87] ident=pb)
	by lurch.internal.reciva.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <pb@reciva.com>) id 1KzZEZ-0002eF-Tc
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:03:24 +0000
From: Phil Blundell <pb@reciva.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
In-Reply-To: <49184234.3070308@balister.org>
References: <49179A86.8000401@balister.org>
	<1226326248.17085.41.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com>
	<49184234.3070308@balister.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:03:23 +0000
Message-Id: <1226333003.17085.71.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 
Subject: Re: Stand at FOSDEM
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:05:16 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 07:16 -0700, Philip Balister wrote:
> So you are suggesting we request a devroom for some grooup hacking? Last=20
> year the stand was a mini devroom :)

Not necessarily for hacking as such, but yes: I think a devroom (either
dedicated, or as some kind of splinter faction of the embedded track)
would probably be more productive than a stand.

Alternatively we could set up an unofficial OE track in, say, the Cafe
de l'Universit=C3=A9. :-)  Of course, downside there is no internet access.

p.