From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
David Collier-Brown <davecb@sun.com>,
Tim Connors <tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:09:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1227406165.7685.20008.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081121082533.27075.12056.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:00 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> * Reverted sched MC level and CPU level fine tuning in v2.6.28-rc4 for
> now. These affect consolidation since SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE is
> removed. I will rework the tuning in the next iteration to
> selectively enable them at sched_mc=2
Looking forward to the next version.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-23 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 8:30 [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/7] sched: Framework for sched_mc/smt_power_savings=N Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 19:45 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-11-22 18:06 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] sched: favour lower logical cpu number for sched_mc balance Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/7] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-23 2:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 6:14 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] sched: bias task wakeups to preferred semi-idle packages Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/7] sched: activate active load balancing in new idle cpus Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/7] sched: re-tune balancing -- revert Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/7] sched: fine-tune SD_MC_INIT " Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-23 2:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1227406165.7685.20008.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davecb@sun.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.