From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [82.71.203.194] (helo=crown.reciva.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L5IfJ-0006se-Cr; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:34:41 +0100 Received: from castle.reciva.com ([82.71.203.193] helo=lurch.internal.reciva.com) by crown.reciva.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L5IcN-00077h-6E; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:31:39 +0000 Received: from mill.internal.reciva.com ([192.168.106.87] ident=pb) by lurch.internal.reciva.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L5IcM-0000iA-2s; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:31:38 +0000 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <200811252242.05674.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <200811261011.09918.openembedded@haerwu.biz> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:31:37 +0000 Message-Id: <1227699097.15601.28.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org Subject: Re: [RFC] LICENSE fields and packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:34:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 12:21 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > ${PN}-license package on which all entries from PACKAGES will RDEPEND? > > Any objections to doing it this way till we have a proper bbclass? I think this is a fine idea. It should be a DISTRO opt-in choice, of course, but I can't see any reason not to provide the facility. p.