From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [82.71.203.194] (helo=crown.reciva.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L5RyJ-0005As-5C; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:30:55 +0100 Received: from 79-71-239-31.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([79.71.239.31] helo=[192.168.2.154]) by crown.reciva.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L5RvD-0000Og-A6; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:27:44 +0000 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <200811261755.53197.mickey@vanille-media.de> <1227721214.19934.33.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <1227722637.19934.36.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com> <1227726026.23391.245.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:27:33 +0000 Message-Id: <1227734853.23391.271.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org Subject: Re: preferred-provider at the image level a.k.a why is all this fso stuff in my non-fso image X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:30:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 21:09 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > I'd rather have it only Conflict:, but that places extra burden on the > fso people. I must admit to being a bit baffled as to the effect that you (and/or the fso people) are trying to produce. Can you explain a bit more of the background to this arrangement of packages? p.