From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] checkpoint/restart: fix cr_ctx_checkpoint() locking Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:25:31 -0800 Message-ID: <1228256731.2971.183.camel@nimitz> References: <20081202185734.F740150C@kernel> <20081202185736.EF0F917D@kernel> <4935B52D.6050706@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4935B52D.6050706-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Oren Laadan Cc: containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 17:22 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote: > any reason why you want to reference the entire ->fs instead of, as I > suggested, make a *copy* of ->fs->root and then reference its > contents ? This looked simpler to me. We're going to have to rip this sucker out anyway, so I went for what I thought was the smallest amount of code. -- Dave