From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] checkpoint/restart: simplify cr_scan_fds() Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:23:17 -0800 Message-ID: <1228321397.2971.249.camel@nimitz> References: <20081202185734.F740150C@kernel> <20081202185742.CB0FDECC@kernel> <493655E2.7040304@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <493655E2.7040304-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Oren Laadan Cc: containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 04:48 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote: > (as discussed in the LKML thread) as far as I can see the existing code is > safe, and this code is not more correct (for restart) in terms of races with > changes to the file table ? Agreed. This just saves a few lines of code. -- Dave