From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] No get_user/put_user while holding mmap_sem in do_pages_stat?
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:46:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228844782.6978.1.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493EA116.5020208@inria.fr>
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 17:47 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 15:21 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> >
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>
> >>> Was lockdep able to tell you about this in any way?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> With CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING (assuming that it's enough), it doesn't detect
> >> the problem for real. It just says "possible recursive locking detected"
> >> between do_page_fault and sys_move_pages.
> >>
> >
> > That is real - how much more real do you need a description of a
> > recursive deadlock to be?
> >
>
> Well, it's a recursive down_read. It could be ok if we had the guarantee
> that nobody else would be doing down_write in the middle. lockdep only
> complained about this recursive down_read when there was a down_write
> actually causing the deadlock, but it didn't say anything about this
> down_write in the log.
>
> It would be great if lockdep could say "recursive read-lock is
> deadlocking because this other guy (with its backtrace) took for write
> in the middle". I needed sysrq-t to get this info.
rwsem does not support recursive read-locks, so irrespective of write
side locks, its a bug.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-09 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-07 2:14 [RFC/PATCH] No get_user/put_user while holding mmap_sem in do_pages_stat? Brice Goglin
2008-12-07 2:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-07 14:21 ` Brice Goglin
2008-12-09 14:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-09 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-09 16:47 ` Brice Goglin
2008-12-09 17:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228844782.6978.1.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.