From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
To: Cal Page <pagcal@runbox.com>
Cc: ubifs <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ubifs backtrace for - BUG: scheduling while atomic - when runs out of space
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:16:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229580961.17960.51.camel@sauron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229580771.17960.46.camel@sauron>
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 08:12 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:37 -0500, Cal Page wrote:
> > !!! Note: BUG() placed at kernel/sched.c schedule() at 'scheduling while atomic'
> >
> > Backtrace:
> >
> > [<c0e1e640>] (schedule+0x0/0x6dc) from [<c0d2245c>] (wait_op_done+0xb0/0x150)
> > [<c0d223ac>] (wait_op_done+0x0/0x150) from [<c0d22740>] (send_prog_page+0x64/0x74)
> > r5 = C0F2ABE0 r4 = C661FAC0
> > [<c0d226dc>] (send_prog_page+0x0/0x74) from [<c0d22934>] (mxc_nand_command+0x16c/0x3ec)
> > [<c0d227c8>] (mxc_nand_command+0x0/0x3ec) from [<c0d1ddd8>] (nand_write_page+0x80/0xd4)
> > [<c0d1dd58>] (nand_write_page+0x0/0xd4) from [<c0d1e83c>] (nand_do_write_ops+0x2b0/0x340)
> > r7 = 0004AA60 r6 = C4B07000 r5 = 00000000 r4 = 00000800
> > [<c0d1e58c>] (nand_do_write_ops+0x0/0x340) from [<c0d1f71c>] (nand_write+0xa0/0xc0)
> > [<c0d1f67c>] (nand_write+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0d153e8>] (part_write+0xb0/0xec)
> > [<c0d15338>] (part_write+0x0/0xec) from [<c0d2a6b0>] (ubi_io_write+0x78/0xb4)
> > r7 = FFFFFFE2 r6 = C4B07000 r5 = 00000000 r4 = 00010000
> > [<c0d2a638>] (ubi_io_write+0x0/0xb4) from [<c0d28af0>] (ubi_eba_write_leb+0x94/0x83c)
> > [<c0d28a5c>] (ubi_eba_write_leb+0x0/0x83c) from [<c0d27d9c>] (ubi_leb_write+0xec/0x104)
> > [<c0d27cb0>] (ubi_leb_write+0x0/0x104) from [<c0c77fac>] (dbg_leb_write+0x9c/0xb8)
> > r8 = C4B07000 r7 = 0000003C r6 = C509BB00 r5 = 00000800 r4 = C44DE000
> > [<c0c77f10>] (dbg_leb_write+0x0/0xb8) from [<c0c542ac>] (ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock+0x444/0x6f4)
> > [<c0c53e68>] (ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock+0x0/0x6f4) from [<c0c46f30>] (write_head+0x10c/0x150)
> > [<c0c46e24>] (write_head+0x0/0x150) from [<c0c470d0>] (ubifs_jnl_write_inode+0x12c/0x25c)
> > [<c0c46fa4>] (ubifs_jnl_write_inode+0x0/0x25c) from [<c0c50c38>] (ubifs_write_inode+0x118/0x18c)
> > [<c0c50b20>] (ubifs_write_inode+0x0/0x18c) from [<c0bf2e68>] (__writeback_single_inode+0x200/0x384)
> > r7 = C405C5EC r6 = C459EC00 r5 = C405C554 r4 = 00000001
> > [<c0bf2c68>] (__writeback_single_inode+0x0/0x384) from [<c0bf32a0>] (sync_sb_inodes+0x1d8/0x2c8)
> > [<c0bf30c8>] (sync_sb_inodes+0x0/0x2c8) from [<c0bf35a4>] (generic_sync_sb_inodes+0x10/0x14)
> > [<c0bf3594>] (generic_sync_sb_inodes+0x0/0x14) from [<c0c65534>] (ubifs_budget_space+0x98c/0xe98)
> > [<c0c64ba8>] (ubifs_budget_space+0x0/0xe98) from [<c0c4a578>] (ubifs_prepare_write+0x18c/0x1a4)
> > [<c0c4a3ec>] (ubifs_prepare_write+0x0/0x1a4) from [<c0bb22f4>] (generic_file_buffered_write+0x2a0/0x694)
> > [<c0bb2058>] (generic_file_buffered_write+0x4/0x694) from [<c0bb2c24>] (__generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x53c/0x5bc)
> > [<c0bb26e8>] (__generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x0/0x5bc) from [<c0bb2d20>] (generic_file_aio_write+0x7c/0xf0)
> > [<c0bb2ca8>] (generic_file_aio_write+0x4/0xf0) from [<c0c49220>] (ubifs_aio_write+0x1b4/0x244)
> > [<c0c49070>] (ubifs_aio_write+0x4/0x244) from [<c0bd2718>] (do_sync_write+0xc0/0x114)
> > [<c0bd2658>] (do_sync_write+0x0/0x114) from [<c0bd30d8>] (vfs_write+0xb8/0x194)
> > r6 = C44DFF80 r5 = BEF15AF8 r4 = C5183CA0
> > [<c0bd3020>] (vfs_write+0x0/0x194) from [<c0bd37f0>] (sys_write+0x4c/0x80)
> > r7 = 00000004 r6 = 00000000 r5 = 0006E000 r4 = C5183CA0
> > [<c0bd37a4>] (sys_write+0x0/0x80) from [<c0b6fde0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c)
> > r6 = 4001D660 r5 = BEF15AF8 r4 = 00002000
> > Code: e59f0650 ebf5b444 ebf554f6 e3a03000 (e5833000)
>
> Sorry, I do not have ideas. It sounds like you have schedule() called
> while having a spinlock locked. None of these functions seem to do have
> spinlocks.
>
> What I would do, I'd put explicit 'schedule()' call at the beginning of
> each function in the dump. Hopefully this would show the offender
> function.
Also, please, enable lockdep. It is under "Kernel hacking -> Lock
debugging: prove locking correctness" in the kernel config menu.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-17 15:37 ubifs backtrace for - BUG: scheduling while atomic - when runs out of space Cal Page
2008-12-18 6:12 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-18 6:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1229580961.17960.51.camel@sauron \
--to=dedekind@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pagcal@runbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.