From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:32119 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752351AbYLVD4j (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:56:39 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/43] iwl3945 merges into iwlagn (Dec 19) From: Zhu Yi To: drago01 Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: References: <1229654263-21454-1-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:55:35 +0800 Message-Id: <1229918135.24353.177.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> (sfid-20081222_045643_444742_F068F272) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 03:32 +0800, drago01 wrote: > > Well it doesn't really matter but wouldn't it make sense to rename the > driver back to iwlwifi ? (as 3945 does not support n mode) Well, an AGN driver (iwlagn) doesn't mean it cannot support AG only (3945) device ;-) But, iwlwifi should also be fine. Tomas and Reinette, what do you think? Anyway, we can decide until the port is done in .30 time frame. Thanks, -yi