From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Consolidate irq stack switching to a single macro
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:22:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1230301344-570-3-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230301344-570-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
Instead of scattering the logic around, move all stack switching logic
into a single macro which calls a caller-supplied logic.
This makes changing the logic easier and improves readability.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 59 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index 4d47cb8..4f1a38f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -315,6 +315,22 @@ ENTRY(native_usergs_sysret64)
CFI_REL_OFFSET r15, R15+\offset
.endm
+ .macro call_in_irqstack func
+ /* Switch to the irq stack, unless already on it, then call func */
+ push %rbp
+ CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 8
+ mov %rsp,%rbp
+ CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rbp
+ incl %gs:pda_irqcount
+ cmovz %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
+ EMPTY_FRAME 0
+ call \func
+ leaveq
+ CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
+ CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -8
+ decl %gs:pda_irqcount
+ .endm
+
/* save partial stack frame */
ENTRY(save_args)
XCPT_FRAME
@@ -336,18 +352,6 @@ ENTRY(save_args)
je 1f
SWAPGS
/*
- * irqcount is used to check if a CPU is already on an interrupt stack
- * or not. While this is essentially redundant with preempt_count it is
- * a little cheaper to use a separate counter in the PDA (short of
- * moving irq_enter into assembly, which would be too much work)
- */
-1: incl %gs:pda_irqcount
- jne 2f
- popq_cfi %rax /* move return address... */
- mov %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
- EMPTY_FRAME 0
- pushq_cfi %rax /* ... to the new stack */
- /*
* We entered an interrupt context - irqs are off:
*/
2: TRACE_IRQS_OFF
@@ -819,8 +823,7 @@ END(interrupt)
subq $10*8, %rsp
CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 10*8
call save_args
- PARTIAL_FRAME 0
- call \func
+ call_in_irqstack \func
.endm
/*
@@ -836,7 +839,6 @@ common_interrupt:
ret_from_intr:
DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
TRACE_IRQS_OFF
- decl %gs:pda_irqcount
leaveq
CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -8
@@ -1060,7 +1062,7 @@ ENTRY(\sym)
TRACE_IRQS_OFF
movq %rsp,%rdi /* pt_regs pointer */
xorl %esi,%esi /* no error code */
- call \do_sym
+ call_in_irqstack \do_sym
jmp paranoid_exit /* %ebx: no swapgs flag */
CFI_ENDPROC
END(\sym)
@@ -1096,7 +1098,7 @@ ENTRY(\sym)
movq %rsp,%rdi /* pt_regs pointer */
movq ORIG_RAX(%rsp),%rsi /* get error code */
movq $-1,ORIG_RAX(%rsp) /* no syscall to restart */
- call \do_sym
+ call_in_irqstack \do_sym
jmp paranoid_exit /* %ebx: no swapgs flag */
CFI_ENDPROC
END(\sym)
@@ -1239,19 +1241,7 @@ END(kernel_execve)
/* Call softirq on interrupt stack. Interrupts are off. */
ENTRY(call_softirq)
CFI_STARTPROC
- push %rbp
- CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 8
- CFI_REL_OFFSET rbp,0
- mov %rsp,%rbp
- CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rbp
- incl %gs:pda_irqcount
- cmove %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
- push %rbp # backlink for old unwinder
- call __do_softirq
- leaveq
- CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
- CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -8
- decl %gs:pda_irqcount
+ call_in_irqstack __do_softirq
ret
CFI_ENDPROC
END(call_softirq)
@@ -1281,15 +1271,8 @@ ENTRY(xen_do_hypervisor_callback) # do_hypervisor_callback(struct *pt_regs)
movq %rdi, %rsp # we don't return, adjust the stack frame
CFI_ENDPROC
DEFAULT_FRAME
-11: incl %gs:pda_irqcount
- movq %rsp,%rbp
- CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rbp
- cmovzq %gs:pda_irqstackptr,%rsp
- pushq %rbp # backlink for old unwinder
- call xen_evtchn_do_upcall
- popq %rsp
+ call_in_irqstack xen_evtchn_do_upcall
CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
- decl %gs:pda_irqcount
jmp error_exit
CFI_ENDPROC
END(do_hypervisor_callback)
--
1.6.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-26 14:22 [PATCH 0/4] Remove interrupt stack table usage from x86_64 kernel (v2) Avi Kivity
2008-12-26 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: drop the use of the tss interrupt stack table (IST) Avi Kivity
2008-12-26 14:22 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-12-26 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Make interrupt stack switching atomic Avi Kivity
2008-12-26 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: Move NMI back to interrupt stack Avi Kivity
2008-12-26 14:35 ` [PATCH 0/4] Remove interrupt stack table usage from x86_64 kernel (v2) Ingo Molnar
2008-12-26 14:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-27 21:42 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1230301344-570-3-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.