From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Helsley Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:57:27 -0800 Message-ID: <1231289847.14345.243.camel@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: trond.myklebust-41N18TsMXrtuMpJDpNschA@public.gmane.org Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linux Containers , linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "J. Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Containers , Cedric Le Goater List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:39 -0500, trond.myklebust-41N18TsMXrtuMpJDpNschA@public.gmane.org wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: > > IMHO This seems more incorrect than trying to use a more proximal > namespace. > > You have yet to explain why. Yes, I know I have to explain why. If you would please have a little more patience you might see I have replied to your original request for an explanation -- I *just* sent it out. If I don't see it show up soon I'll resend it as a reply here. OK? Cheers, -Matt Helsley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Helsley Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:57:27 -0800 Message-ID: <1231289847.14345.243.camel@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linux Containers , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "J. Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Containers , Cedric Le Goater To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Return-path: Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:33552 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753488AbZAGA5d (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:57:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:39 -0500, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: > > IMHO This seems more incorrect than trying to use a more proximal > namespace. > > You have yet to explain why. Yes, I know I have to explain why. If you would please have a little more patience you might see I have replied to your original request for an explanation -- I *just* sent it out. If I don't see it show up soon I'll resend it as a reply here. OK? Cheers, -Matt Helsley From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758127AbZAGA5o (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:57:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754674AbZAGA5e (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:57:34 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:33552 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753488AbZAGA5d (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:57:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces From: Matt Helsley To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linux Containers , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "J. Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Containers , Cedric Le Goater In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:57:27 -0800 Message-Id: <1231289847.14345.243.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:39 -0500, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: > > IMHO This seems more incorrect than trying to use a more proximal > namespace. > > You have yet to explain why. Yes, I know I have to explain why. If you would please have a little more patience you might see I have replied to your original request for an explanation -- I *just* sent it out. If I don't see it show up soon I'll resend it as a reply here. OK? Cheers, -Matt Helsley