From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760965AbZANKzB (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:55:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758686AbZANKyl (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:54:41 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:51404 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758595AbZANKyk (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:54:40 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: fix build error in kernel/sched_rt.c when RT_GROUP_SCHED && !SMP From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Gregory Haskins , rostedt@home.goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20090114080111.GC18649@elte.hu> References: <20090113014333.GA23448@elte.hu> <20090113023345.32433.28954.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090114080111.GC18649@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:54:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1231930476.7141.27.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 09:01 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Gregory Haskins wrote: > > > +#define dec_rt_group(rt_se, rt_rq) do { } while (0) > > Please dont _ever_ introduce new CPP macros into core kernel code, and if > you see existing once, please fix them to be proper C inline functions. > (there's a few other new macros in your patchset) Generally good advice, and certainly doable in this case. But in some very rare occasions I've had to use CPP in order to avoid silly header dependency hell -- I think we should add comments in such cases as to why we use CPP.