All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] firs round of SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.29-rc1
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:48:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232131733.3224.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090116090928.e43c986e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 09:09 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:56:11 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is acutally four bug fixes and part of a fusion update which was a
> > bit late processing through the merge window, but which should be
> > perfectly acceptable for -rc1.
> > 
> > ...
> >
> > Full diff below.
> 
> I like full diffs.
>  
> > --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
> > +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
> > @@ -79,9 +79,22 @@ MODULE_VERSION(my_VERSION);
> >  /*
> >   *  cmd line parameters
> >   */
> > -static int mpt_msi_enable = -1;
> > -module_param(mpt_msi_enable, int, 0);
> > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpt_msi_enable, " MSI Support Enable (default=0)");
> > +
> > +static int mpt_msi_enable_spi;
> > +module_param(mpt_msi_enable_spi, int, 0);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpt_msi_enable_spi, " Enable MSI Support for SPI \
> > +		controllers (default=0)");
> > +
> > +static int mpt_msi_enable_fc;
> > +module_param(mpt_msi_enable_fc, int, 0);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpt_msi_enable_fc, " Enable MSI Support for FC \
> > +		controllers (default=0)");
> > +
> > +static int mpt_msi_enable_sas;
> > +module_param(mpt_msi_enable_sas, int, 1);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpt_msi_enable_sas, " Enable MSI Support for SAS \
> > +		controllers (default=1)");
> > +
> > 
> > ...
> 
> Those MODULE_PARM_DESC strings are going to come out funny-looking,
> with extra tabs and stuff.

Yes ... the compiler complained about a few of the other updates, which
I told them to redo ... I didn't notice these.

> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpt_debug_level, " debug level - refer to mptdebug.h \
> > +	- (default=0)");
> > +
> > +int mpt_fwfault_debug;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpt_fwfault_debug);
> > +module_param_call(mpt_fwfault_debug, param_set_int, param_get_int,
> > +	  &mpt_fwfault_debug, 0600);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpt_fwfault_debug, "Enable detection of Firmware fault"
> > +	" and halt Firmware on fault - (default=0)");
> 
> That one got it right.
> 
> >  
> >  #ifdef MFCNT
> >  static int mfcounter = 0;
> > @@ -1751,16 +1774,25 @@ mpt_attach(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >  		ioc->bus_type = SAS;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (mpt_msi_enable == -1) {
> > -		/* Enable on SAS, disable on FC and SPI */
> > -		if (ioc->bus_type == SAS)
> > -			ioc->msi_enable = 1;
> > -		else
> > -			ioc->msi_enable = 0;
> > -	} else
> > -		/* follow flag: 0 - disable; 1 - enable */
> > -		ioc->msi_enable = mpt_msi_enable;
> >  
> > +	switch (ioc->bus_type) {
> > +
> > +	case SAS:
> > +		ioc->msi_enable = mpt_msi_enable_sas;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case SPI:
> > +		ioc->msi_enable = mpt_msi_enable_spi;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case FC:
> > +		ioc->msi_enable = mpt_msi_enable_fc;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	default:
> > +		ioc->msi_enable = 0;
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> >  	if (ioc->errata_flag_1064)
> >  		pci_disable_io_access(pdev);
> >  
> > @@ -6313,6 +6345,33 @@ mpt_print_ioc_summary(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc, char *buffer, int *size, int len, int sh
> >  	*size = y;
> >  }
> >  
> > +
> > +/**
> > + *	mpt_halt_firmware - Halts the firmware if it is operational and panic
> > + *	the kernel
> > + *	@ioc: Pointer to MPT_ADAPTER structure
> > + *
> > + **/
> > +void
> > +mpt_halt_firmware(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
> > +{
> > +	u32	 ioc_raw_state;
> > +
> > +	ioc_raw_state = mpt_GetIocState(ioc, 0);
> > +
> > +	if ((ioc_raw_state & MPI_IOC_STATE_MASK) == MPI_IOC_STATE_FAULT) {
> > +		printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT "IOC is in FAULT state (%04xh)!!!\n",
> > +			ioc->name, ioc_raw_state & MPI_DOORBELL_DATA_MASK);
> > +		panic("%s: IOC Fault (%04xh)!!!\n", ioc->name,
> > +			ioc_raw_state & MPI_DOORBELL_DATA_MASK);
> > +	} else {
> > +		CHIPREG_WRITE32(&ioc->chip->Doorbell, 0xC0FFEE00);
> > +		panic("%s: Firmware is halted due to command timeout\n",
> > +			ioc->name);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpt_halt_firmware);
> 
> Doing a panic() after we've already detected an error is plain nasty. 
> Is there no way in which we can allow the kernel to continue?

There's a long thread discussing this very point on linux-scsi.  The
short version is "no, it's only used for debugging firmware and if
you've corrupted your firmware to this point you need the machine
halting".

> 
> >  /*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*/
> >  /*
> >   *	Reset Handling
> > @@ -6345,6 +6404,8 @@ mpt_HardResetHandler(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc, int sleepFlag)
> >  	printk(MYIOC_s_INFO_FMT "HardResetHandler Entered!\n", ioc->name);
> >  	printk("MF count 0x%x !\n", ioc->mfcnt);
> >  #endif
> > +	if (mpt_fwfault_debug)
> > +		mpt_halt_firmware(ioc);
> >  
> >  	/* Reset the adapter. Prevent more than 1 call to
> >  	 * mpt_do_ioc_recovery at any instant in time.
> > diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h
> > index dff048c..b3e981d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h
> > +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h
> > @@ -922,11 +922,14 @@ extern void	 mpt_free_fw_memory(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc);
> >  extern int	 mpt_findImVolumes(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc);
> >  extern int	 mptbase_sas_persist_operation(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc, u8 persist_opcode);
> >  extern int	 mpt_raid_phys_disk_pg0(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc, u8 phys_disk_num, pRaidPhysDiskPage0_t phys_disk);
> > +extern void     mpt_halt_firmware(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc);
> > +
> >  
> >  /*
> >   *  Public data decl's...
> >   */
> >  extern struct list_head	  ioc_list;
> > +extern int mpt_fwfault_debug;
> >  
> >  /*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*/
> >  #endif		/* } __KERNEL__ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
> > index ee09041..e62c6bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
> > +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.c
> > @@ -1846,6 +1846,9 @@ mptscsih_abort(struct scsi_cmnd * SCpnt)
> >  	if (hd->timeouts < -1)
> >  		hd->timeouts++;
> >  
> > +	if (mpt_fwfault_debug)
> > +		mpt_halt_firmware(ioc);
> 
> So one single global flag affects all controllers in the system?
> 
> I guess that's OK if it's just a debug/diag thing.

Yes, that's correct.

> >  	/* Most important!  Set TaskMsgContext to SCpnt's MsgContext!
> >  	 * (the IO to be ABORT'd)
> >  	 *
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c
> > index a745f91..e7705d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c
> > @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ int iscsi_tcp_segment_done(struct iscsi_tcp_conn *tcp_conn,
> >  			   struct iscsi_segment *segment, int recv,
> >  			   unsigned copied)
> >  {
> > -	static unsigned char padbuf[ISCSI_PAD_LEN];
> >  	struct scatterlist sg;
> >  	unsigned int pad;
> >  
> > @@ -233,7 +232,7 @@ int iscsi_tcp_segment_done(struct iscsi_tcp_conn *tcp_conn,
> >  			debug_tcp("consume %d pad bytes\n", pad);
> >  			segment->total_size += pad;
> >  			segment->size = pad;
> > -			segment->data = padbuf;
> > +			segment->data = segment->padbuf;
> >  			return 0;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c
> > index 2d4f32b..9ad4d09 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c
> > @@ -1258,35 +1258,48 @@ qla2x00_init_rings(scsi_qla_host_t *vha)
> >  {
> >  	int	rval;
> >  	unsigned long flags = 0;
> > -	int cnt;
> > +	int cnt, que;
> >  	struct qla_hw_data *ha = vha->hw;
> > -	struct req_que *req = ha->req_q_map[0];
> > -	struct rsp_que *rsp = ha->rsp_q_map[0];
> > +	struct req_que *req;
> > +	struct rsp_que *rsp;
> > +	struct scsi_qla_host *vp;
> >  	struct mid_init_cb_24xx *mid_init_cb =
> >  	    (struct mid_init_cb_24xx *) ha->init_cb;
> 
> This cast worries me.  It's a cast between two complex data structures
> which appear to have nothing to do with each other.

Actually, it's a C++ type construct.  ha->init_cb is of type init_cb_t,
mid_init_cb actually contains this (via a second indirection) as the
first element, so what it's doing is dynamically casting out based on
the board type.

> Oh well.  It _is_ a scsi driver :(

James



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-16 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-16 14:56 [GIT PATCH] firs round of SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.29-rc1 James Bottomley
2009-01-16 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 18:48   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-01-16 19:07     ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 20:28       ` James Bottomley
2009-01-16 19:09     ` David Miller
2009-01-16 19:02   ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-16 19:10     ` David Miller
2009-01-16 20:09       ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-16 20:15         ` James Bottomley
2009-01-17 21:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-11  4:08   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-11 12:42     ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1232131733.3224.46.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.