[PATCH] bnx2: annotate bp->phy_lock functions

[Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>]

It looks like the locking is OK as the locks were being taken before the
various phy setup functions, add the annotations as they release and
reacquire the phy_lock.

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/bnx2.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index d4a3dac..d86a8f2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
@@ -1497,6 +1497,8 @@ static int bnx2_fw_sync(struct bnx2 *, u32, int, int);
 
 static int
 bnx2_setup_remote_phy(struct bnx2 *bp, u8 port)
+__releases(&bp->phy_lock)
+__acquires(&bp->phy_lock)
 {
 	u32 speed_arg = 0, pause_adv;
 
@@ -1554,6 +1556,8 @@ bnx2_setup_remote_phy(struct bnx2 *bp, u8 port)
 
 static int
 bnx2_setup_serdes_phy(struct bnx2 *bp, u8 port)
+__releases(&bp->phy_lock)
+__acquires(&bp->phy_lock)
 {
 	u32 adv, bmcr;
 	u32 new_adv = 0;
@@ -1866,6 +1870,8 @@ bnx2_set_remote_link(struct bnx2 *bp)
 
 static int
 bnx2_setup_copper_phy(struct bnx2 *bp)
+__releases(&bp->phy_lock)
+__acquires(&bp->phy_lock)
 {
 	u32 bmcr;
 	u32 new_bmcr;
@@ -1963,6 +1969,8 @@ bnx2_setup_copper_phy(struct bnx2 *bp)
 
 static int
 bnx2_setup_phy(struct bnx2 *bp, u8 port)
+__releases(&bp->phy_lock)
+__acquires(&bp->phy_lock)
 {
 	if (bp->loopback == MAC_LOOPBACK)
 		return 0;
@@ -2176,6 +2184,8 @@ bnx2_init_copper_phy(struct bnx2 *bp, int reset_phy)
 
 static int
 bnx2_init_phy(struct bnx2 *bp, int reset_phy)
+__releases(&bp->phy_lock)
+__acquires(&bp->phy_lock)
 {
 	u32 val;
 	int rc = 0;
-- 
1.6.1.249.g455e5