All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Nick Pelly <npelly@google.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Jaikumar Ganesh <jaikumar@google.com>
Subject: Re: duplicate L2CAP connection requests - before and after L2CAP information response
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:20:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233134405.2139.0.camel@violet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35c90d960901280116k30f461edod533baa4fb4b5f5@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Nick,

> > I think your kernel is wrongly patched. Don't cherry-pick patches that
> > you don't know the impact of.
> 
> Thanks for testing,
> 
> I've narrowed it down. The rogue patch is in fact ours:
> 
> @@ -916,8 +916,8 @@ static inline void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct
> hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *s
>                 }
>         }
> 
> +       hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
>         if (ev->status) {
> -               hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
>                 hci_conn_del(conn);
>         }
> 
> This patch was motivated by a discussion in an earlier thread - see
> conn->state vs conn->sk->sk_state.
> 
> Sorry for the false alarm, I was not initially suspicious of this
> patch because it was not in l2cap.c.

I commented on that one and gave you a proper patch which is also in
bluetooth-testing.git ;)

Regards

Marcel



      reply	other threads:[~2009-01-28  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-26 23:29 duplicate L2CAP connection requests - before and after L2CAP information response Nick Pelly
2009-01-27  1:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-27  1:38   ` Nick Pelly
2009-01-27  3:06     ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-27  4:23       ` Nick Pelly
2009-01-28  8:12         ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-01-28  9:16           ` Nick Pelly
2009-01-28  9:20             ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1233134405.2139.0.camel@violet \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=jaikumar@google.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npelly@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.