From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BBF8DDFA9 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:03:47 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm: Make drm_local_map use a resource_size_t offset From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Dave Airlie In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970902030039n786b831dm4395b802e0c87b45@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090202055559.8D600DDF51@ozlabs.org> <1233608464.4932.15.camel@gaiman> <1233609688.18767.118.camel@pasglop> <21d7e9970902030039n786b831dm4395b802e0c87b45@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:02:00 +1100 Message-Id: <1233651720.16867.82.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: David Airlie , Eric Anholt , dri-devel@lists.sf.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Don't worry I've applied the patches with Erics comment replacing your one. > > All 3 are queued in drm-next. Thanks ! I'll let you know when I finally get a chance to tackle the other issues. BTW. Do you guys want me to remove the drm_local_map_t typedef completely in favor of struct drm_local_map ? I have a patch here going part way through that, it's fairly trivial, so if you want it, I can easily finish it. Cheers, Ben.