All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	stable kernel <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable bit 11 in _PDC to advertise hw coord
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:06:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233778002.4286.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090204195331.GA905@khazad-dum.debian.net>

On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:53 -0800, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02 2009, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> > > 
> > > Bit 11 in intel PDC definitions is meant for OS capability to handle
> > > hardware coordination of P-states. In Linux we have always supported
> > > hwardware coordination of P-states. Just let the BIOSes know that we
> > > support it, by setting this bit.
> > > 
> > > Some BIOSes use this bit to choose between hardware or software coordination
> > > and without this change below, BIOSes switch to software coordination, which
> > > is not very optimal in terms of power consumption and extra wakeups from idle.
> > 
> > I can confirm that this fixes the excessive reschedule ipi count on an
> > x60 with the ondemand governor. Can we please get this into 2.6.29?
> 
> And, after that, -stable?
> 

Agreed. This should also go to -stable once it gets into mainline.

Thanks,
Venki


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-04 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-02 19:57 [PATCH] Enable bit 11 in _PDC to advertise hw coord Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-04  8:57 ` Jens Axboe
2009-02-04 19:53   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-02-04 20:06     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh [this message]
2009-02-04 20:40       ` Greg KH
2009-02-08 19:51         ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-02-07  4:10 ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1233778002.4286.61.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.