From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756861AbZBEX7W (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:59:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753824AbZBEX7L (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:59:11 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:47278 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753562AbZBEX7K (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:59:10 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched_rt: protect rt_rq->rt_time by rt_runtime_lock From: Peter Zijlstra To: Hiroshi Shimamoto Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <498B7862.2040004@ct.jp.nec.com> References: <498B77F6.4020702@ct.jp.nec.com> <498B7862.2040004@ct.jp.nec.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:59:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1233878343.4620.44.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 15:38 -0800, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > From: Hiroshi Shimamoto > > Impact: fix possible race condition > > rt_rq->rt_time should be protected. Don't think so, all we do is check the value for non-zero outside the lock, that should be ok. If there's still a race, your changelog utterly fails to mention the race scenario. > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto > --- > kernel/sched_rt.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c > index 299d012..d7654a3 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c > +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c > @@ -496,10 +496,10 @@ static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, int overrun) > struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq); > > spin_lock(&rq->lock); > + spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock); > if (rt_rq->rt_time) { > u64 runtime; > > - spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock); > if (rt_rq->rt_throttled) > balance_runtime(rt_rq); > runtime = rt_rq->rt_runtime; > @@ -510,9 +510,9 @@ static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, int overrun) > } > if (rt_rq->rt_time || rt_rq->rt_nr_running) > idle = 0; > - spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock); > } else if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running) > idle = 0; > + spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock); > > if (enqueue) > sched_rt_rq_enqueue(rt_rq);