From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: Make software counters work as per-cpu counters
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:21:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234232518.2604.335.camel@ymzhang> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209114852.GF18757@elte.hu>
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:48 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Impact: kernel crash fix
> >
> > Yanmin Zhang reported that using a PERF_COUNT_TASK_CLOCK software
> > counter as a per-cpu counter would reliably crash the system, because
> > it calls __task_delta_exec with a null pointer. The page fault,
> > context switch and cpu migration counters also won't function
> > correctly as per-cpu counters since they reference the current task.
> >
> > This fixes the problem by redirecting the task_clock counter to the
> > cpu_clock counter when used as a per-cpu counter, and by implementing
> > per-cpu page fault, context switch and cpu migration counters.
> >
> > Along the way, this:
> >
> > - Initializes counter->ctx earlier, in perf_counter_alloc, so that
> > sw_perf_counter_init can use it
> > - Adds code to kernel/sched.c to count task migrations into each
> > cpu, in rq->nr_migrations_in
> > - Exports the per-cpu context switch and task migration counts
> > via new functions added to kernel/sched.c
> > - Makes sure that if sw_perf_counter_init fails, we don't try to
> > initialize the counter as a hardware counter. Since the user has
> > passed a negative, non-raw event type, they clearly don't intend
> > for it to be interpreted as a hardware event.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
I tested it. The patch does fix the crash.
>
> Very nice, thanks Paul!
>
> > I'm a little concerned about the use of u64 for the existing
> > rq->nr_switches and the new rq->nr_migrations_in. On 32-bit machines
> > this will get updated in two halves, so there is a very small but
> > non-zero probability that reading it will give a bogus value. It's
> > not clear to me what the best way to fix it is, since not all 32-bit
> > platforms have atomic64_t. Maybe make nr_switches and
> > nr_migrations_in unsigned long, or atomic_t?
>
> It used to be 'just stats' so we dont really mind. But now that we
> expose it in a bit more systematic way i agree that it should be
> fixed. Updating to 'unsigned long' sounds good to me.
>
> > I have some sort of git problem with my perfcounters.git repository.
> > I'll let you know when I have that sorted out.
>
> ok - i've applied your patch from email to allow Yanmin to test tip:master.
Ingo,
Here is the patch to add system-wide collection for perfstat.c.
With the new parameter '-s', perfstat introduces very little overhead to benchmark
testing. If tracking performance data without '-s', sometimes perfstat has too much
impact on benchmark results, especially on netperf UDP-U-4k.
Yanmin
---
--- perfstat.c 2009-01-23 03:18:31.000000000 +0800
+++ perfstat_ymz.c 2009-02-10 10:17:46.000000000 +0800
@@ -172,14 +172,18 @@ static char *sw_event_names [] = {
};
#define MAX_COUNTERS 64
+#define MAX_NR_CPUS 256
static int nr_counters = 0;
+static int nr_cpus = 0;
static int event_id[MAX_COUNTERS] =
{ -2, -5, -4, -3, 0, 1, 2, 3};
static int event_raw[MAX_COUNTERS];
+static int system_wide = 0;
+
static void display_help(void)
{
printf(
@@ -195,6 +199,7 @@ static void display_help(void)
" 4: branch instructions\n"
" 5: branch prediction misses\n\n"
" 6: bus cycles\n"
+ " -s # system-wide collection\n"
" -c <cmd..> --command=<cmd..> # command+arguments to be timed.\n"
"\n");
@@ -269,7 +274,7 @@ static void process_options(int argc, ch
{"command", no_argument, NULL, 'c'},
{NULL, 0, NULL, 0 }
};
- int c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "+:e:c",
+ int c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "+:e:c:s",
long_options, &option_index);
if (c == -1)
break;
@@ -277,6 +282,9 @@ static void process_options(int argc, ch
switch (c) {
case 'c':
break;
+ case 's':
+ system_wide = 1;
+ break;
case 'e':
parse_events(optarg);
break;
@@ -302,7 +310,7 @@ char fault_here[1000000];
#define PR_TASK_PERF_COUNTERS_DISABLE 31
#define PR_TASK_PERF_COUNTERS_ENABLE 32
-static int fd[MAX_COUNTERS];
+static int fd[MAX_NR_CPUS][MAX_COUNTERS];
static void create_counter(int counter)
{
@@ -313,16 +321,29 @@ static void create_counter(int counter)
hw_event.raw = event_raw[counter];
hw_event.record_type = PERF_RECORD_SIMPLE;
hw_event.nmi = 0;
- hw_event.inherit = 1;
- hw_event.disabled = 1;
- fd[counter] = sys_perf_counter_open(&hw_event, 0, -1, -1);
- if (fd[counter] < 0) {
- printf("perfstat error: syscall returned with %d (%s)\n",
- fd[counter], strerror(errno));
- exit(-1);
+ if (system_wide) {
+ int cpu;
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu ++) {
+ fd[cpu][counter] = sys_perf_counter_open(&hw_event, -1, cpu, -1);
+ if (fd[cpu][counter] < 0) {
+ printf("perfstat error: syscall returned with %d (%s)\n",
+ fd[cpu][counter], strerror(errno));
+ exit(-1);
+ }
+
+ }
+ } else {
+ hw_event.inherit = 1;
+ hw_event.disabled = 1;
+
+ fd[0][counter] = sys_perf_counter_open(&hw_event, 0, -1, -1);
+ if (fd[0][counter] < 0) {
+ printf("perfstat error: syscall returned with %d (%s)\n",
+ fd[0][counter], strerror(errno));
+ exit(-1);
+ }
}
- assert(fd[counter] >= 0);
}
@@ -344,6 +365,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
process_options(argc, argv);
+ if (system_wide) {
+ nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
+ assert(nr_cpus <= MAX_NR_CPUS);
+ assert(nr_cpus >= 0);
+ } else
+ nr_cpus = 1;
+
for (counter = 0; counter < nr_counters; counter++)
create_counter(counter);
@@ -375,12 +403,16 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
fprintf(stderr, "\n");
for (counter = 0; counter < nr_counters; counter++) {
- u64 count;
-
- res = read(fd[counter],
- (char *) &count, sizeof(count));
- assert(res == sizeof(count));
+ int cpu;
+ u64 count, single_count;
+ count = 0;
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu ++) {
+ res = read(fd[cpu][counter],
+ (char *) &single_count, sizeof(single_count));
+ assert(res == sizeof(single_count));
+ count += single_count;
+ }
if (!event_raw[counter] &&
(event_id[counter] == PERF_COUNT_CPU_CLOCK ||
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-10 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-09 11:42 [PATCH] perf_counter: Make software counters work as per-cpu counters Paul Mackerras
2009-02-09 11:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 2:21 ` Zhang, Yanmin [this message]
2009-02-10 13:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1234232518.2604.335.camel@ymzhang \
--to=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.