From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759491AbZBLR1n (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:27:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757051AbZBLR1f (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:27:35 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:56322 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755017AbZBLR1e (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:27:34 -0500 Subject: Re: git-send-email From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Oeser Cc: Junio C Hamano , L-K , Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <200902121825.35021.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> References: <1234451714.10603.22.camel@laptop> <200902121825.35021.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:27:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1234459643.10603.33.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.25.90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 18:25 +0100, Ingo Oeser wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday 12 February 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > could we change the default of git-send-email to --no-chain-reply-to? > > These incredibly deep mail threads are a nuisance. > > No, they are great, if you like to skip over a topic, you are not > interested in at all! A single depth thread can do that too. > If you don't like it, just switch off thread in your mailer and > don't force this on everybody else! That's something quite different. I quite like the subject grouping, what I don't like is not being able to read distinct subject lines because the n-th email in the patch series in so deep the threading in my mailer can't display the subject anymore.