From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: irq-disabled vs vmap vs text_poke
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:31:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234859516.4744.12.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090217030353.GA31504@wotan.suse.de>
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 04:03 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> It is not a bad idea, but I don't think it quite goes far enough.
> IMO we should reserve 2 pages of virtual memory for each CPU, and
> then do the mapping/unmapping without locking, and with another
> variant of unmap_kernel_range that does not do the global TLB
> flush.
A bit like kmap_atomic() except for 2 pages and !highmem. Should work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-17 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 12:50 irq-disabled vs vmap vs text_poke Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-13 12:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-13 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-13 13:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-13 14:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-13 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-13 14:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-13 18:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-13 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-13 13:09 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-13 14:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-13 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-13 16:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-13 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-13 16:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-13 18:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-13 18:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-13 21:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-16 15:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-16 15:31 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-16 17:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-17 2:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-17 3:03 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-02-17 17:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-17 16:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-17 17:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-17 17:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-17 17:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-17 17:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-17 17:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-13 14:27 ` [PATCH] x86: text_poke might sleep Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1234859516.4744.12.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.