From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753820AbZBRMbU (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:31:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751756AbZBRMbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:31:12 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:55382 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751741AbZBRMbL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:31:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perfcounters: clean up rotate_percpu From: Peter Zijlstra To: MinChan Kim Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20090218212730.dde6942b.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> References: <20090218212730.dde6942b.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:31:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1234960267.4637.62.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.25.90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 21:27 +0900, MinChan Kim wrote: > Ingo implemented rotate function at 235c7fc7c500e4fd1700c4ad01b5612bcdc1b449. > I think he want to implement rotate_percpu but he don't implement it yet. > > If we need not it immediately, > It would be better to remove it until we will need it again. It seems to me, a more constructive patch would be to implement it for him.