From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [78.47.116.26] (helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lbzvi-0003CC-A7 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:14:46 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (e180190230.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.190.230]) by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07C65847DA for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:35:45 +0100 (CET) From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <49A3BBE0.9070404@gefanuc.com> References: <69E6C70090A0A14498CC98FAE5E06B6E3CF653@hiob.intern.dresearch.de> <49A3BBE0.9070404@gefanuc.com> Organization: Vanille-Media Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:11:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1235491906.27962.58.camel@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Subject: Re: Mailinglists, was: Re: Bugtracker Status X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:14:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 09:20 +0000 schrieb Martyn Welch: > Sledz, Steffen wrote: > >> OK, Philip indicated he got confused by the proposals, so > >> here's a rundown > >> > >> current situation: > >> > >> Openembedded-announce > >> Openembedded-commits > >> Openembedded-devel > >> Openembedded-issues > >> Openembedded-stablebranch > >> Openembedded-users > >> Openembedded-private > >> > >> new situation: > >> > >> openembedded-devel - for humans to post patches and ask questions > >> openembedded-bots - commits, bugs, logs, etc > >> Openembedded-private - core team I'm ok with that in principle, but I'm not really fond of renaming existing mailing lists. I'd rather keep openembedded-commits intact and have the bugtracker send its reports there. >the Openembedded-users list still seems to be active. Has there been a >change of heart, I this thread seems to contain nothing but approval? It looks like all people who cared to comment are in favour of the changes. If you want me to do that, you have to wait until I have some admin-time-slots free -- probably on weekend. >Also, I haven't seen anything about this on Openembedded-users, might >it be worth asking the subscribers of that list how they feel about >this? Sounds good, can do you that, please? :M: