From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [78.47.116.26] (helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LbzxG-0003G0-Ap for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:22 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (e180190230.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.190.230]) by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817555847D8 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:37:21 +0100 (CET) From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <20090224064639.GE2172@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <200902131728.08634.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <20090224064639.GE2172@smtp.west.cox.net> Organization: Vanille-Media Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:13:21 +0100 Message-Id: <1235492001.27962.60.camel@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Subject: Re: checksums situation X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:16:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Montag, den 23.02.2009, 23:46 -0700 schrieb Tom Rini: > I'm going to make a different suggestion. Lets just drop it. I'm in favour of this. I don't think they give us the safety we want and they introduce more inconvenience. Cheers, -- :M: