From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Deny external checkpoint unless frozen Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:38:07 -0800 Message-ID: <1235500687.26788.260.camel@nimitz> References: <20090221201317.GB13532@us.ibm.com> <20090223230438.GA2590@us.ibm.com> <1235435947.26788.216.camel@nimitz> <20090224010945.GA4797@us.ibm.com> <1235438283.26788.219.camel@nimitz> <20090224183116.GA21891@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090224183116.GA21891-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Containers , Sukadev Bhattiprolu List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 12:31 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Well the patch is mainly on top of your patchset which defines > the string holding reasons for uncheckpointability, right? I > assume you've modified that since then (too bad we're on a > patch model at the moment) so seems easiest for you to toss it > on top of your set. > > Or you can send your latest version and I (or Suka) can write > the /proc/$$/checkpointable file. What I have so far is actually only for fds and uses /proc/$$/fdinfo/*. I haven't done the per-task file yet. -- Dave