From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [93.97.173.237] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LcFfD-0006Ob-Ma for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:03:09 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1P8xblK028501 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:59:37 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25651-07 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:59:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dax.rpnet.com [192.168.1.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1P8xQ2g028491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:59:27 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <20090225022507.GP2172@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <200902131728.08634.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <20090224064639.GE2172@smtp.west.cox.net> <1235492001.27962.60.camel@andromeda> <8763izyarp.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> <20090224185059.GL2172@smtp.west.cox.net> <87wsbfw9zy.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> <20090225022507.GP2172@smtp.west.cox.net> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:01:48 +0000 Message-Id: <1235552508.5399.2.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: checksums situation X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:03:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 19:25 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:01:05PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > [snip] > > I do belive that the best way to solve it is to have a md5 file together > > with the .bb recipe. This solves the problems for forks, derivatives and > > also makes harder to just use "cat tmp/checksums.ini >> conf/checksums.ini". > > Running a script that will make the .sum file isn't any harder really. > And it's still a "this is the checksum we downloaded" not "this is the > checksum upstream says is correct". You can specify the md5 as part of the SRC_URI if I remember correctly. Its just such a pain, nobody does. -- RP