From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas@shipmail.org>,
Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix lock order reversal between mmap_sem and struct_mutex.
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:07:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235552836.4645.3089.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235549745.5213.4.camel@gaiman>
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 00:15 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > Or you could get_user_pages() to fault the user pages and pin them, and
> > then do pagefault_disable() and use copy_from_user_inatomic or such, and
> > release the pages again.
>
> I started poking at this today, since the get_user_pages sounded like
> the solution. Only then I noticed: when we unbind an existing object,
> we have to unmap_mapping_range to clear the clients' mappings to it in
> the GTT, which needs to happen while the struct lock (protecting the gtt
> structure and the gtt to object mappings) is held. So for fault we have
> mmap_sem held to struct mutex taken for poking at the gtt structure, and
> for unbind we have struct mutex held to mmap_sem taken to clear
> mappings.
So it again comes down to the fact that you cannot pin a gtt object
without also holding this struct_mutex?
Normally such things are done by elevating a refcount so that both
regular frees and reclaim gets delayed until you're done with the
object.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-25 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-18 0:59 [PATCH] drm: Fix lock order reversal between mmap_sem and struct_mutex Eric Anholt
2009-02-18 8:02 ` Wang Chen
2009-02-18 16:38 ` [PATCH] drm: Take mmap_sem up front to avoid lock order violations krh
2009-02-19 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-19 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-19 14:49 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2009-02-19 15:17 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-19 15:21 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2009-02-19 12:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-21 2:33 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-18 15:08 ` [PATCH] drm: Fix lock order reversal between mmap_sem and struct_mutex Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-19 21:02 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-02-19 22:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-20 2:04 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-20 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-25 8:15 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-25 8:54 ` Thomas Hellström
2009-02-25 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-02-20 8:31 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-02-20 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235552836.4645.3089.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=thomas@shipmail.org \
--cc=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.