From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:16:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1235999772.5330.368.camel@laptop> References: <1235762883-20870-1-git-send-email-me@felipebalbi.com> <200902281405.42080.david-b@pacbell.net> <200903011454.22280.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:53743 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751903AbZCBNQ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:16:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200903011454.22280.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: David Brownell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , me@felipebalbi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, felipe.balbi@nokia.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, sameo@openedhand.com On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 14:54 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > The main "complaint" is the pre-existing lockdep breakage. :) Right, I just send a patch to fix that, by simply fixing !lockdep to do as lockdep does :-) IRQF_DISABLED is bonkers, we should simply always disable interrupts for interrupt handlers. The only problem you have is your of your own tinkering.