From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [78.47.116.26] (helo=drlauer-research.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LepGD-0000pf-RF for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:27:38 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (e180183108.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.183.108]) by drlauer-research.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9B9584168 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:48:08 +0100 (CET) From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: References: <20090303204954.CCB9CE8008@amethyst.openembedded.net> <1236119119.10602.62.camel@andromeda> <49ADB183.5070709@balister.org> <1236120999.10602.70.camel@andromeda> <49AE5117.5020806@gefanuc.com> <1236162102.10602.97.camel@andromeda> Organization: Vanille-Media Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:23:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1236165806.10602.102.camel@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : angstrom 2009.X: bump automake-native to 1.10. 2 since some idiot deleted 1.10 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:27:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 11:54 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: > On 04-03-09 11:21, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 09:59 +0000 schrieb Martyn Welch: > >> "Review" is defined as posting it on the mailing lists and getting positive agreement from two or more core developers. > > > > Let me propose these kinds of patches being promoted in an unstable > > branch rather than via mailing list. This eases testing and playing > > around with the patch. > > Patches posted to the mailinglist get more eyes on them. More eyes but less actual testing, since it involves patching your current tree to be able to see the effects. > > Although there were 0 comments (among those none in favour, but also > > none against), I still think that org.oe.{stable,testing(dev),unstable} > > with a strict only-cherry-picking-from-right-to-left-allowed policy > > would improve our workflow and overall stability. > > That will just boil down to people only using stable or testing All but those who actually work on the branch -- which sounds like a good thing to me, since that's what stable and testing are about. -- :M: