From: "Javier Martín" <lordhabbit@gmail.com>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation.
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:58:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236182302.31907.11.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090304.033605.238092958.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2086 bytes --]
El mié, 04-03-2009 a las 03:36 -0800, David Miller escribió:
> From: Vesa Jääskeläinen <chaac@nic.fi>
> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:34:46 +0200
>
> > David Miller wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/grub/sparc64/setjmp.h b/include/grub/sparc64/setjmp.h
> > > index 12d8e01..183a820 100644
> > > --- a/include/grub/sparc64/setjmp.h
> > > +++ b/include/grub/sparc64/setjmp.h
> > > @@ -19,8 +19,7 @@
> > > #ifndef GRUB_SETJMP_CPU_HEADER
> > > #define GRUB_SETJMP_CPU_HEADER 1
> > >
> > > -/* FIXME (sparc64). */
> > > -typedef unsigned long grub_jmp_buf[20];
> > > +typedef unsigned long grub_jmp_buf[3];
> >
> > I assume unsigned long is 64bit in sparc?
>
> Yes, for sparc64 long is always 64-bit, no exceptions.
>
> > Would it be more practical to use grub_uint64_t?
>
> This is a "sparc64" file, so I don't think so.
Next month, or maybe next year, someone will need to fix some bug on
sparc64 code without being sparc64-savvy, maybe because (like it's
already happened) there are no sparc people available. That day people
like Bean, Felix, Marco or Robert (to name just a few of the big gurus
here) may have to decide between editing a sparc64 file or give up on
maintaining the platform. That day it would be really good for them to
visually know that "unsigned long" is 64-bit in sparc, instead of having
to go see the docs. This is the real utility of typedefs (and the
[u]intNN_t types from C99): if you statically _know_ that some variable
is going to be 64 bits long because the _platform_ requires it, why not
make it explicit? It will be easier for readers and maintainers.
As an example of what this entails, the failure to think with the future
in mind has extraordinarily hampered the 32->64 bit transition: many
Windows apps (among them the Vorbis codecs!) had be nearly rewritten
because they used "unsigned long" interchangeably with pointer types. I
still wonder if it would have been so difficult to use "void*", and the
proper types for pointer arithmetic.
--
-- Lazy, Oblivious, Rational Disaster -- Habbit
[-- Attachment #2: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-04 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-04 2:15 [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation David Miller
2009-03-04 10:59 ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
2009-03-04 11:05 ` David Miller
2009-03-04 11:34 ` Vesa Jääskeläinen
2009-03-04 11:36 ` David Miller
2009-03-04 15:58 ` Javier Martín [this message]
2009-03-04 21:02 ` David Miller
2009-03-05 13:04 ` Isaac Dupree
2009-03-05 13:24 ` David Miller
2009-03-06 18:55 ` Robert Millan
2009-03-06 19:03 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-03-07 0:39 ` David Miller
2009-03-07 5:56 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-03-07 10:38 ` Robert Millan
2009-03-07 14:29 ` David Miller
2009-03-07 0:34 ` David Miller
2009-03-07 10:39 ` Robert Millan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1236182302.31907.11.camel@localhost \
--to=lordhabbit@gmail.com \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.