All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: "Chauhan, Vijay" <Vijay.Chauhan@lsi.com>
Cc: "'dm-devel@redhat.com'" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]scsi_dh_rdac: Retry for NOT_READY check condition (0x02A102, 0x020401, 0x020404 and  0x020407) in rdac_check_sense
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:46:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236699991.14822.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0D1E8821739E724A86F4D16902CE275C140E25CA0C@inbmail01.lsi.com>

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:30 +0530, Chauhan, Vijay wrote:
> This patch adds retry for NOT_READY check conditions(02/A1/02, 02/04/01, 02/04/04,
> 02/04/07) in rdac_check_sense.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Chauhan<vijay.chauhan@lsi.com>
> 
> ---
> --- linux-2.6.29-rc7/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c.orig	2009-03-10 17:42:27.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.29-rc7/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c	2009-03-10 18:05:35.000000000 +0530
> @@ -562,6 +562,30 @@ static int rdac_check_sense(struct scsi_
>  			 * Just retry and wait.
>  			 */
>  			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
> +		if (sense_hdr->asc == 0xA1  && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x02)
> +			/* LUN Not Ready - Quiescense in progress
> +			 * or has been achieved
> +			 * Just retry.
> +			 */
> +			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;

This is fine, being vendor specific, we don't handle it at the mid-layer

> +		if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04 && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x01)
> +			/* LUN Not Ready - Logical Unit Not Ready and is in
> +			 * the process of becoming ready
> +			 * Just retry.
> +			 */
> +			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
> +		if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04 && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x04)
> +			/* LUN Not Ready - Format In Progress
> +			 *
> +			 * Just retry.
> +			 */
> +			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
> +		if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04  && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x07)
> +			/* LUN Not Ready - Storage controller cannot respond
> +			 * immediately to a PRIN or PROUT command.
> +			 * Just retry.
> +			 */
> +			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;

For all of these ... along with a few other not ready types, we already
do a delayed retry at the mid-layer (in scsi_io_completion).  Is there
some problem that causes this to need to be handled here as well?

James

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-10 13:00 [PATCH]scsi_dh_rdac: Retry for NOT_READY check condition (0x02A102, 0x020401, 0x020404 and 0x020407) in rdac_check_sense Chauhan, Vijay
2009-03-10 15:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-03-10 15:46 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-03-17 13:21   ` Chauhan, Vijay
2009-03-24 19:38     ` Chandra Seetharaman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1236699991.14822.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=Vijay.Chauhan@lsi.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.