From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Peter W. Morreale" Subject: Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:59:19 -0600 Message-ID: <1237467559.6926.31.camel@hermosa> References: <49C12E64.1000301@us.ibm.com> <87prge1rhu.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Vernon Mauery , netdev , LKML , rt-users To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from charybdis-ext.suse.de ([195.135.221.2]:47671 "EHLO emea5-mh.id5.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752726AbZCSM72 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:59:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87prge1rhu.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:54 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Vernon Mauery writes: > > > > But then again I'm not sure it's worth it if the problem only > happens in out of tree RT. > Heh. That darn bastard child again, eh? :-) Recall that adaptive spin,developed in RT, is now in mainline. Best, -PWM