From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <10023762.21237868208390.JavaMail.root@domain.hid> References: <10023762.21237868208390.JavaMail.root@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:59:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1237885177.6815.36.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Support for static APIs in uITRON skin List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: ravikiran.saralaya@domain.hid Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 00:16 -0400, ravikiran.saralaya@domain.hid wrote: > Thanks Philippe for the clarification. > > I am curious to know if there are any attempts being done to make uITRON skin compliant to uITRON Specification version 4.03.00. > No idea. > Regards, > Ravikiran > > -- Philippe Gerum wrote : > ravikiran.saralaya@domain.hid.... wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am planning to use Xenomai 2.4.7 for uITRON based application. > > > > However it seems the uITRON skin doesn't support static creation of tasks, semaphores etc. Is there any specific reason for not supporting static APIs in Xenomai uITRON skin? > > > None, aside of the fact that this implementation supports level E from the > uITRON spec, and it seems rather straightforward to get static object creation > at init time out of the existing dynamic object creation services. > > > > > How can I go about in supporting static APIs for uITRON? > > > > Regards, > > Ravikiran > > > > > > > > -- > > This message was sent on behalf of ravikiran.saralaya@domain.hid.... at openSubscriber.com > > http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/xenomai@xenomai.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xenomai-help mailing list > > Xenomai-help@domain.hid.... > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help > > > > -- Philippe.