From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
To: "david@lang.hm" <david@lang.hm>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:40:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238085621.21971.3.camel@alok-dev1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0903260008050.13440@asgard.lang.hm>
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 00:10 -0700, david@lang.hm wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Alok Kataria wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:38 -0700, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >> I am not saying we should not hide this behind a config at all. The
> >> point is there is nothing that we save by adding a new config, so what's
> >> the point at all. If you can give me a solid reason like, say, you save
> >> 1% code space with this config option, or 'n' sec in the boottime, I am
> >> all ears for such an argument.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > So, if there are any tangible benefits with doing this I am ok with it,
> > but your current argument about "Freedom to user" doesn't sound too
> > compelling.
>
> isn't it the other way around? you are adding this in, it should be up to
> you to show that it
>
> A. has no impact
>
> B. has a small enough impact that it's not worth the config option
This is what exactly I have mentioned in a mail earlier in this thread.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/25/333
Alok
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 9:19 [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-17 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 9:48 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-17 15:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-25 5:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-25 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 16:52 ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-25 17:07 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-25 17:24 ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-25 17:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-25 18:18 ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-26 7:10 ` david
2009-03-26 16:40 ` Alok Kataria [this message]
2009-03-27 0:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-25 13:38 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-17 17:28 ` Alok Kataria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1238085621.21971.3.camel@alok-dev1 \
--to=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.