From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, bharrosh@panasas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] block: fix queue bounce limit setting
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 20:04:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238583884-13517-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1238583884-13517-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Impact: don't set GFP_DMA in q->bounce_gfp unnecessarily
All DMA address limits are expressed in terms of the last addressable
unit (byte or page) instead of one plus that. However, when
determining bounce_gfp for 64bit machines in blk_queue_bounce_limit(),
it compares the specified limit against 0x100000000UL to determine
whether it's below 4G ending up falsely setting GFP_DMA in
q->bounce_gfp.
As DMA zone is very small on x86_64, this makes larger SG_IO transfers
very eager to trigger OOM killer. Fix it. While at it, rename the
parameter to @dma_mask for clarity and convert comment to proper
winged style.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
block/blk-settings.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 59fd05d..aa4364c 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -156,26 +156,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_make_request);
/**
* blk_queue_bounce_limit - set bounce buffer limit for queue
- * @q: the request queue for the device
- * @dma_addr: bus address limit
+ * @q: the request queue for the device
+ * @dma_mask: the maximum address the device can handle
*
* Description:
* Different hardware can have different requirements as to what pages
* it can do I/O directly to. A low level driver can call
* blk_queue_bounce_limit to have lower memory pages allocated as bounce
- * buffers for doing I/O to pages residing above @dma_addr.
+ * buffers for doing I/O to pages residing above @dma_mask.
**/
-void blk_queue_bounce_limit(struct request_queue *q, u64 dma_addr)
+void blk_queue_bounce_limit(struct request_queue *q, u64 dma_mask)
{
- unsigned long b_pfn = dma_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ unsigned long b_pfn = dma_mask >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int dma = 0;
q->bounce_gfp = GFP_NOIO;
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
- /* Assume anything <= 4GB can be handled by IOMMU.
- Actually some IOMMUs can handle everything, but I don't
- know of a way to test this here. */
- if (b_pfn < (min_t(u64, 0x100000000UL, BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
+ /*
+ * Assume anything <= 4GB can be handled by IOMMU. Actually
+ * some IOMMUs can handle everything, but I don't know of a
+ * way to test this here.
+ */
+ if (b_pfn < (min_t(u64, 0xffffffffUL, BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH) >> PAGE_SHIFT))
dma = 1;
q->bounce_pfn = max_low_pfn;
#else
--
1.6.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-01 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-01 11:04 [GIT PATCHSET block#for-linus] block: blk-map related fixes Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 1/8] scatterlist: make sure sg_miter_next() doesn't return 0 sized mappings Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 2/8] block: fix SG_IO vector request data length handling Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:47 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 11:50 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 12:18 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 12:24 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 12:27 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:29 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 11:04 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 4/8] bio: actually inline inline bvecs into bio Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:47 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 12:55 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:59 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 5/8] bio: fix bio_kmalloc() Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 6/8] bio: remove size/segments limit on bio_{copy|map}_{user|kern}*() Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-map: let blk_rq_map_user_iov() support null mapping Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 12:03 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-map: reimplement blk_rq_map_user() using blk_rq_map_user_iov() Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:44 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 12:50 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 13:03 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 13:10 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 13:17 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 13:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 13:22 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 13:28 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1238583884-13517-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.