From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Lt7Ag-0002dj-9a for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:58 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lt7Af-0002cA-2E for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lt7Aa-0002YH-I2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49117 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lt7Aa-0002YA-Cw for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:52 -0400 Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:39236) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lt7Aa-0000nO-2n for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:52 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO smtprelay2.cesmail.net) ([192.168.1.112]) by c60.cesmail.net with ESMTP; 12 Apr 2009 17:24:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.220] (pool-141-151-93-148.phlapa.east.verizon.net [141.151.93.148]) by smtprelay2.cesmail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 296B334C6A; Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:26:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <200904110830.02945.colin@gibibit.com> References: <1232851143.23773.13.camel@localhost> <49DFD57E.9040905@gmail.com> <200904111909.48927.okuji@enbug.org> <200904110830.02945.colin@gibibit.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:49 -0400 Message-Id: <1239571489.14481.24.camel@ct> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. Cc: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:24:57 -0000 On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 08:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote: > If we could build with -Werror, then it wouldn't be so hard to find the > warnings since the build would abort... It's also possible to redirect stderr to a file so that the build doesn't stumble on the first warning. I my opinion, making the build less verbose will increase the probability that the warnings will be caught and fixed by their makers rather than by dedicated warning hunters who may not know the code so well as those who wrote it. And that's a good thing. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin