From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Pitcock Subject: Re: xen.git branch reorg Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:33:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1240932793.10269.99.camel@petrie> References: <351130.85293.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <351130.85293.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: bderzhavets@yahoo.com Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hmm. I'll try to debug it if I have time over the weekend. It shouldn't be very hard to do. Do you have any specifics on what is failing? William On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 08:01 -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > I am talking about usual HVM DomUs. > >the only difference is the running qemu-dm process or stub > > domain. > > That's failing with current 2.6.30-rc3-tip under Xen 3.4-rc3-pre > at least through my experience. > Should be well known issue for Jeremy. > > Boris. > > > > --- On Tue, 4/28/09, William Pitcock wrote: > From: William Pitcock > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg > To: bderzhavets@yahoo.com > Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" , "Xen-devel" > > Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 10:51 AM > > I think you are talking about HVM PV drivers. HVM itself is no different > than > booting a paravirtualized guest as far as the dom0 kernel is > concerned... the only difference is the running qemu-dm process or stub > domain. > > William > > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 02:14 -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > >I could pull a spare server out of the production > > >grid for testing HVM under 2.6.30 if needed. > > > > As far as to my knowledge Xen 3.4-rc3-pre Dom0 & (2.6.30-rc3-tip) > > support only PV DomUs. HVM is still unsolved problem. > > If i am wrong about that, please advise. > > > > Boris. > > > > > > --- On Tue, 4/28/09, William Pitcock > wrote: > > From: William Pitcock > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg > > To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" > > Cc: "Xen-devel" > > Date: > Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 3:13 AM > > > > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 16:48 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > > William Pitcock > > wrote: > > > > Yeah, it's working here now. Thanks for that. > > > > > > > > We intend to start testing the 3.4 release candidate > with 2.6.30 > > > > paravirt-ops dom0 in our test environment this weekend. > > > > > > > > > > OK, that'll be interesting. What's your test > environment? > > > > Paravirtualization-only nocona-based (early EM64T) Xeon hardware, > with > > nodes comprising of dual 2.8ghz CPUs with 8GB of memory, on Debian > > testing. > > > > Production is presently at 3.2 with XenLinux 2.6.18 patches > rebased > > against 2.6.26. Production machines > are dual opteron 2216 machines > with > > 8GB-16GB of RAM, with both HVM and Paravirtualized domains. > > > > The test and production grids use the same storage backend, which > is > > presently provided through exporting LVM volumes with AoE and > > cluster-lvm. > > > > I could pull a spare server out of the production grid for testing > HVM > > under 2.6.30 if > > needed. > > > > William > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > >